← Back to context

Comment by miroljub

1 day ago

The whole point of org-mode is that it's so malleable, that you can extend it to be whatever you want it to be, much easier than writing your own, ad-hoc, bug-ridden reimplementation of org-mode.

Org-mode is the most appropriate answer. It is as simple or as sophisticated as we want it to be.

Obviously one needs to be an Emacs user first

  • > Obviously one needs to be an Emacs user first

    The only reason why I still use Emacs daily is org-mode.

  • > Obviously one needs to be an Emacs user first

    This makes it so infuriating that the top comment on Todo systems is almost invariably "just org-mode lol". Same as remote editing "just TRAMP lol".

    I am not going to completely change my editor and rebuild two decades of optimization just to use two Emacs tools.

    On-topic: TickTick or Todoist with a slimmed-down "Getting Things Done" system works really well. Almost no learning curve, and you get to free up so much mental bandwidth vis a vis remembering things and prioritizing things. And you don't have to do hamfisted tricks to make a 'simple' .txt system work. Bliss.

    • > I am not going to completely change my editor and rebuild two decades of optimization just to use two Emacs tools.

      Change your editor and rebuild two decades of optimisation in order to use Emacs, two Emacs tools, and also every other Emacs tool out there. Org Mode, TRAMP, Magit, gptel, eglot, flycheck, elfeed, ERC, Emms, EWW … there are a ton of reasons to use Emacs.

      Or you can keep using less-capable systems and being annoyed when folks recommend that you upgrade.

      2 replies →

    • Agreed on TRAMP. It's great and all, but not worth abandoning your toolong.

      org-mode though... It's called Emacs' killer app for a reason. Even if I only used Emacs for org-mode it'd be worth it. And I don't even use the productivity features.