← Back to context

Comment by dcreater

20 hours ago

I think the title buries the lede? Its specific to GPT-OSS and exposes the shady stuff Ollama is doing to acquiesce/curry favor/partner with/get paid by corporate interests

I think "shady" is a little too harsh - sounds like they forked an important upstream project, made incompatible changes that they didn't push upstream or even communicate with upstream about, and now have to deal with the consequences of that. If that's "shady" (despite being all out in the open) then nearly every company I've worked for has been "shady."