← Back to context

Comment by dylan604

18 hours ago

> - making cringe hardware that basically noone purchased (Zune, Windows Phone)

The Surface looks cool to me, but since it runs Windows, I will never use it. Does it only look cool, or is actually a cool device?

In addition to being able to run any regular Windows application, it had the best and most intuitive feeling UX of any tablet in history. Amongst many other features, window management was gesture controlled and Internet Explorer had an alternate UI that moved the tabs to the bottom of the screen to make them easier to reach.

Sadly, Windows 10 removed all the good parts of Windows tablet mode, but its ideas were so good that Apple is still slowly copying bits of its interface for the iPad to this day.

  • This feels more like the OS is what you liked. Nothing really about the hardware which this thread is about regarding Microsoft making crap hardware products. Is the hardware so mediocre that the best thing about it was the OS where nothing about the hardware deserves comments? If that's the case, maybe that points to validating Microsoft makes crap hardware being a true comment.

Linux runs perfectly fine on most of the Surfaces:

https://github.com/linux-surface/linux-surface/wiki/Supporte...

There's the usual asterisk here or there, as with most laptops; but, outside of some golden devices, it's about on par with most.

  • Great, but I'm not looking to run Linux either.

    You've completely answered by not answering the actual question though. Is it actually a cool device?

    • You specifically stated "since it runs Windows, I will never use it" and I addressed that point. If your qualifier is "runs MacOS/iOS", then your following question is moot for every non-Apple device.

      Either way, no one can answer your subjective opinion-based query. Go test it out at the dozens of kiosks in any city in a Western nation (or, barring that, watch a youtube video) and judge for yourself.

      4 replies →

  • > Linux runs perfectly fine on most of the Surfaces [...] There's the usual asterisk here or there,

    Are we reading the same tables? The last several models are full of question marks and crosses in the support matrix, and many models old and new seemingly require the linux-surface kernel fork for key features like touchscreens and even some touchpads, you can't just install your distro of choice.

    Even compared to my disappointing experience running Linux at home, I'd say that's more of an asterisk minefield, except for a few Surface Laptop models.

    • Did you miss all of the columns before the literal latest version of the Surface Pro?

      Or the other tables of other hardware models where all versions work?

      If so then yes, it seems like we’re not seeing the same data.

      1 reply →