← Back to context

Comment by JustExAWS

2 days ago

Your web app is statistically irrelevant. If PWAs were so much better on Android, then why do companies still make Android apps and web apps?

Well, one reason is that most Android phones being sold are so underpowered that you have to make a native app to get decent performance. Facebook for one found out early on that it couldn’t get away with just having an app that was a web wrapper because of low end Android devices.

So where are all of the great groundbreaking popular web apps?

And saying the current US government is in agreement with you about anything isn’t the positive thing you seem to be implying it is…

The vast majority of what people use a phone for works perfectly fine as a PWA on cheap hardware.

Apple is essentially responsible for the shit show that is react native, flutter and all the other cross platform crap. Just let us build for the web with basic support for a native like experience. Works fine on every platform but iOS and iPadOS.

I as a small business don't want to write three separate fucking apps. I don't want to charge customers more to cover that. It's a waste of everyone's time and money.

  • If it’s just Apple, then why are most companies still releasing Android apps.

    So Apple is now responsible for the shit show of current web development and at the same time isn’t keeping up or doesn’t care about the web? Which is it?

    I could swear that the two most popular web frameworks over the years either came from Google or Facebook.

    How praytell is Apple responsible for Google’s Flutter - that they also have basically abandoned.

    And run once run anywhere has never worked in the history of the industry.

  • You get it. It's expensive to develop for iOS (or multiple native apps), and on top of that, once you do get into their app store, you pay Apple a significant percentage of any purchases made through the app, as well as the possibility that Apple will steal your idea and add it to their OS as they have done in the past. Fuck all that noise, when web apps are perfectly capable, secure, and the only thing stopping them is Apple's greed.

>Your web app is statistically irrelevant.

So you think I'm the only person who ever had this problem? The DOJ apparently disagrees with you.

>Well, one reason is that most Android phones being sold are so underpowered that you have to make a native app to get decent performance.

Bullshit. It has nothing to do with performance, it has everything to do with Apple's abusive business practices not allowing any other web view on their platform, and purposely hobbling their browser for anti-competitive greedy business reasons.

>So where are all of the great groundbreaking popular web apps?

So where are your goalposts moving next?

>And saying the current US government is in agreement with you about anything isn’t the positive thing you seem to be implying it is…

I didn't say the current US government, the DOJ under the previous administration is the one that filed the charges against Apple. But I know you aren't arguing in good faith, so maybe we should just agree to disagree.

  • Those were always my goalposts - web apps sucked when Microsoft tried to do it with Windows CE, RIM tried to do it, Palm and even Apple. They suck on mobile, electron apps sucked, etc

    If the only reason web apps aren’t on iPhones is because of Safari and if there are other browser engines available for Android and Chrome is so much better, wouldn’t you expect to see great PWAs on Android? Especially with it being 70% of the world wide market?

    > Bullshit. It has nothing to do with performance, it has everything to do with Apple's abusive business practices not allowing any other web view on their platform, and purposely hobbling their browser for anti-competitive greedy business reasons.

    It doesn’t have anything to do with performance of iOS devices that’s true - because Apple doesn’t make any devices with substandard hardware with bad browser performance. But there are plenty of crappy Android device (most of them by sales volume) that do have subpar hardware performance.

    But native apps are more performant than web based apps and web wrappers. Are you denying that?

    > I didn't say the current US government, the DOJ under the previous administration is the one that filed the charges against Apple. But I know you aren't arguing in good faith, so maybe we should just agree to disagree.

    One of us haven’t checked to see what the DOJ’s complaints are about - none of which are alternate browser engines…

    • >web apps sucked when Microsoft tried to do it with Windows CE, RIM tried to do it, Palm

      Wow, that's quite the reach. Again, bad faith.

      >wouldn’t you expect to see great PWAs on Android?

      I do, YMMV. I even created one myself. But again, bad faith from you.

      >because Apple doesn’t make any devices with substandard hardware

      "You're holding it wrong" proves you wrong.

      >that do have subpar hardware performance.

      None of this is about a hardware dick-measuring contest, but you sure are trying to move the goalposts that way. Again, bad faith from you.

      >But native apps are more performant than web based apps and web wrappers. Are you denying that?

      This is another logical fallacy. I'm done with you, you're comments are not grounded in anything except your hatred of anything not Apple.

      >One of us haven’t checked to see what the DOJ’s complaints are about - none of which are alternate browser engines…

      Again, just more bullshit from you.

      "The complaint also alleges that Apple’s conduct extends beyond these examples, affecting web browsers, video communication, news subscriptions, entertainment, automotive services, advertising, location services, and more. Apple has every incentive to extend and expand its course of conduct to acquire and maintain power over next-frontier devices and technologies."

      https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-s...

      The "affecting web browsers" part is exactly the thing I described.

      Apple already lost that exact thing in Europe, because Europe sued them for it too, and now you can use alternative browser engines on iOS in Europe. Apple's going to lose that one in the US too.

      You really don't need to reply. I'm just going to give you canned response from here on out because I'm not wasting any more of my time with an Apple shill.

      2 replies →