Comment by NooneAtAll3
2 days ago
I can easily point to deception in two words
1) Hard 2) Words
"Should there be a reform of our justice system" -> "should the law be passed"
"emphasis", "restitution", "compensation" -> too hard to skim, brain is bailing out
---
the only way to provide valid direct democracy is to provide more than enough explanations and rewordings from both sides of the debate *at the point of voting* to remove miscommunication
I agree that it's unnecessarily wordy, but I still don't think it's deceptive. If your brain is bailing out that fast maybe it's better not to vote.
Hard disagree. Systems must be designed with typical human fallibilities in mind.
Anyone that phrases a referendum like that ought to be sentenced to hard labor themselves for attempting to subvert democracy.
This isn't a system, it's a sentence. It's not that hard to read 13 more words.