← Back to context

Comment by userbinator

14 hours ago

and has open sourced a lot of their own code under permissive licenses.

That should be a good clue that it's not worth much to them anymore, and tjat they'd rather rely on random free labour from the "community" than their own developers.

They build more and more of their own UIs on Electron.

Which is a horribly bloated pig that only helps forced obsolescence of hardware. It should be a very disturbing sign that Microsoft itself doesn't seem to know how to do native code anymore, as they invented Win32 and Windows.

I agree that Electron is an abomination.

As for open sourcing software. Is it even possible for them to do something that you would view favorably here? To me it seems like remain closed and they'll get criticized but open up at least some of it and ... they get criticized?

As far as I'm concerned, regardless of other factors the more source code that's out in the open the better off everyone is.