← Back to context Comment by m-schuetz 1 day ago Please try not to be obnoxious and turn this into a language war. 2 comments m-schuetz Reply eru 1 day ago How is this obnoxious?C and C++ have their strengths, but rapid prototyping is generally not seen to be amongst them.This shouldn't be any more controversial than saying that pure Python is generally slow. m-schuetz 20 hours ago They are pretty much the best choice for prototyping 3D apps and GPU algorithms. They're fast, powerful, and don't impose restrictions - you can do whatever and however. It also helps that CUDA is C++.
eru 1 day ago How is this obnoxious?C and C++ have their strengths, but rapid prototyping is generally not seen to be amongst them.This shouldn't be any more controversial than saying that pure Python is generally slow. m-schuetz 20 hours ago They are pretty much the best choice for prototyping 3D apps and GPU algorithms. They're fast, powerful, and don't impose restrictions - you can do whatever and however. It also helps that CUDA is C++.
m-schuetz 20 hours ago They are pretty much the best choice for prototyping 3D apps and GPU algorithms. They're fast, powerful, and don't impose restrictions - you can do whatever and however. It also helps that CUDA is C++.
How is this obnoxious?
C and C++ have their strengths, but rapid prototyping is generally not seen to be amongst them.
This shouldn't be any more controversial than saying that pure Python is generally slow.
They are pretty much the best choice for prototyping 3D apps and GPU algorithms. They're fast, powerful, and don't impose restrictions - you can do whatever and however. It also helps that CUDA is C++.