← Back to context Comment by dcminter 4 days ago In the term "conman" the confidence in question is that of the mark, not the perpetrator. 2 comments dcminter Reply sdwr 4 days ago Isn't confidence referring to the alternate definition of trust, as in "taking you into his confidence"? godelski 4 days ago I think if you used that definition you could equally say "it is the mark that is taking the conman into [the mark's] confidence"
sdwr 4 days ago Isn't confidence referring to the alternate definition of trust, as in "taking you into his confidence"? godelski 4 days ago I think if you used that definition you could equally say "it is the mark that is taking the conman into [the mark's] confidence"
godelski 4 days ago I think if you used that definition you could equally say "it is the mark that is taking the conman into [the mark's] confidence"
Isn't confidence referring to the alternate definition of trust, as in "taking you into his confidence"?
I think if you used that definition you could equally say "it is the mark that is taking the conman into [the mark's] confidence"