Comment by eru
5 months ago
I've seen plenty of blunders, but in general it's better than their previous models.
Well, it depends a bit on what you mean by blunders. But eg I've seen it confidently assert mathematically wrong statements with nonsense proofs, instead of admitting that it doesn't know.
In a very real sense it doesn’t even know that it doesn’t know.
Maybe. But in math you can either produce the proof (with each step checkable) or you can't.