← Back to context

Comment by LPisGood

17 hours ago

> My point is that there is open levels of collusion with the Biden admin (and Obama earlier) and media corps

What do you mean?

Twitter Files, the FBI @ facebook

This case just doesnt sit right with me.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/26/biden-admin-cant-be...

  • Foreign operatives were legitimately engaging in information warfare against the American people, so it makes sense for FBI and others to let American companies know when their platforms are being used for these things.

    This is especially true when such content is already against the policy of those services.

    • "Foreign operatives were legitimately engaging in information warfare against the American people" - says the government at the time, therein lies the concern.

      No Government should regulate the internet.

      4 replies →

It's probably a reference to the twitter files which showed coordinated efforts between Trump term1 and Twitter.

  • The “Twitter files” showed almost nothing of substance, to my knowledge. What are these coordinated efforts you’re talking about?

    • The Twitter Files, much like the Mueller Report is useful to determine who the disingenuous or ignorant are. The people most likely to bring them up make claims completely opposite to what is actually contained within the documents because that's what they were told was in them. They can't ever be bothered to actually read the things they are using as "evidence". They just have to point to them ominously.

      To them the Twitter files proves that Democrats and Twitter collaborated to suppress conservative voices and boost liberals despite showing nothing to that effect.

      To them the Mueller Report fully exonerates Trump and proves it was nothing but a Democratic smear campaign. Despite it showing the opposite.

      Reality doesn't matter anymore. These are "facts" to roughly 1/3rd of the US population.