← Back to context Comment by genrader 14 hours ago No, because one built a civilization and the other is actual nonsense 6 comments genrader Reply staticman2 13 hours ago >>>No, because one built a civilization and the other is actual nonsenseIf you believe the bible isn't superstitious nonsense then maybe you should say that directly."One built a civilization" describes a lot of religious books and seems to be a non sequitur.Of course "The bible is like this occult book except the bible is true" isn't a very interesting argument. GuB-42 12 hours ago This makes me realize that despite the association between the occult and horrible things. So many more people died in the name of the Bible.The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written. It certainly built a thriving civilization, but it came at a cost. naasking 4 hours ago > The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written.Books are excuses for war that would have already happened. They would have just found other reasons if the Bible didn't exist. tclancy 9 hours ago Please clarify, instructions unclear. donkeybeer 9 hours ago The Romans built a civilization ryandv 14 hours ago Just about as nonsense as Plato and the cave allegory, I agree.
staticman2 13 hours ago >>>No, because one built a civilization and the other is actual nonsenseIf you believe the bible isn't superstitious nonsense then maybe you should say that directly."One built a civilization" describes a lot of religious books and seems to be a non sequitur.Of course "The bible is like this occult book except the bible is true" isn't a very interesting argument.
GuB-42 12 hours ago This makes me realize that despite the association between the occult and horrible things. So many more people died in the name of the Bible.The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written. It certainly built a thriving civilization, but it came at a cost. naasking 4 hours ago > The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written.Books are excuses for war that would have already happened. They would have just found other reasons if the Bible didn't exist.
naasking 4 hours ago > The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written.Books are excuses for war that would have already happened. They would have just found other reasons if the Bible didn't exist.
>>>No, because one built a civilization and the other is actual nonsense
If you believe the bible isn't superstitious nonsense then maybe you should say that directly.
"One built a civilization" describes a lot of religious books and seems to be a non sequitur.
Of course "The bible is like this occult book except the bible is true" isn't a very interesting argument.
This makes me realize that despite the association between the occult and horrible things. So many more people died in the name of the Bible.
The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written. It certainly built a thriving civilization, but it came at a cost.
> The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written.
Books are excuses for war that would have already happened. They would have just found other reasons if the Bible didn't exist.
Please clarify, instructions unclear.
The Romans built a civilization
Just about as nonsense as Plato and the cave allegory, I agree.