← Back to context Comment by genrader 1 day ago No, because one built a civilization and the other is actual nonsense 6 comments genrader Reply staticman2 1 day ago >>>No, because one built a civilization and the other is actual nonsenseIf you believe the bible isn't superstitious nonsense then maybe you should say that directly."One built a civilization" describes a lot of religious books and seems to be a non sequitur.Of course "The bible is like this occult book except the bible is true" isn't a very interesting argument. GuB-42 1 day ago This makes me realize that despite the association between the occult and horrible things. So many more people died in the name of the Bible.The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written. It certainly built a thriving civilization, but it came at a cost. naasking 20 hours ago > The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written.Books are excuses for war that would have already happened. They would have just found other reasons if the Bible didn't exist. tclancy 1 day ago Please clarify, instructions unclear. donkeybeer 1 day ago The Romans built a civilization ryandv 1 day ago Just about as nonsense as Plato and the cave allegory, I agree.
staticman2 1 day ago >>>No, because one built a civilization and the other is actual nonsenseIf you believe the bible isn't superstitious nonsense then maybe you should say that directly."One built a civilization" describes a lot of religious books and seems to be a non sequitur.Of course "The bible is like this occult book except the bible is true" isn't a very interesting argument.
GuB-42 1 day ago This makes me realize that despite the association between the occult and horrible things. So many more people died in the name of the Bible.The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written. It certainly built a thriving civilization, but it came at a cost. naasking 20 hours ago > The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written.Books are excuses for war that would have already happened. They would have just found other reasons if the Bible didn't exist.
naasking 20 hours ago > The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written.Books are excuses for war that would have already happened. They would have just found other reasons if the Bible didn't exist.
>>>No, because one built a civilization and the other is actual nonsense
If you believe the bible isn't superstitious nonsense then maybe you should say that directly.
"One built a civilization" describes a lot of religious books and seems to be a non sequitur.
Of course "The bible is like this occult book except the bible is true" isn't a very interesting argument.
This makes me realize that despite the association between the occult and horrible things. So many more people died in the name of the Bible.
The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written. It certainly built a thriving civilization, but it came at a cost.
> The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written.
Books are excuses for war that would have already happened. They would have just found other reasons if the Bible didn't exist.
Please clarify, instructions unclear.
The Romans built a civilization
Just about as nonsense as Plato and the cave allegory, I agree.