← Back to context

Comment by pansa2

3 days ago

Doesn't matter what it is, it shouldn't break fundamental rules of the language.

Ruby's `case`/`in` has the same problem.

11 comments

pansa2

Reply
almostgotcaught  3 days ago

> it shouldn't break fundamental rules of the language

it doesn't? you simply don't understand what a match statement is.

https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch19-03-pattern-syntax.html

    let num = Some(4);

    match num {
        Some(x) if x % 2 == 0 => println!("The number {x} is even"),
        Some(x) => println!("The number {x} is odd"),
        None => (),
    }

notice that x is bound to 4.

  • tialaramex  3 days ago

    Which x? There are two in your code, one for each time you introduce a pattern Some(x) and each x has scope which of course ends when that pattern is done with

    Notice that the Python doesn't work this way, we didn't make a new variable but instead changed the existing one.

    Also, the intent in the Python was a constant, in Rust we'd give this constant an uppercase name by convention, but regardless it's a constant and so of course matching against a constant does what you expect, it can't re-bind a constant, 404 is a constant and so is `const NOT_FOUND: u16 = 404;`

    • almostgotcaught  3 days ago

      > Which x? There are two in your code, one for each time you introduce a pattern Some(x) and each x has scope which of course ends when that pattern is done with

      if each x's scope ends at the end of each case doesn't that mean there's only one x?

      > we didn't make a new variable but instead changed the existing one.

      so because python doesn't have scopes except for function scopes it shouldn't ever have any new features that intersect with scope?

      6 replies →