← Back to context

Comment by harimau777

2 days ago

I think the problem is that there's a difference between a good manager and a manager who keeps their job.

The incentive is more strongly aligned with the latter one than the former one.

I'm going through a bit of a phase at the moment, so I'm biased. It's "show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome".

I used to find that an interesting idea, not sure if true or not. Nowadays a few years later, I'm almost hyper focusing on it, because I'm noticing that it is mostly true. Like, there's some room for individuality but when things _matter_ (e.g. livelihood, etc.), then the incentive seems paramount for most people.

  • > I'm going through a bit of a phase at the moment, so I'm biased. It's "show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome".

    I've been in that "phase" for several years now. It's rarely steered me wrong.

I had one that fired everyone he hired, I was the last one and one other guy, I got the can for sticking up for the other guy, and the other guy got a demotion. Eventually when things at the company were bad enough the manager got the can with a ton of other managers.

My friend who is still there says this is his last ever programming job, after that manager he wants nothing to do with this industry, and that is a shame.

despite talk of "great flattening" I've found that management seems to be strangely immune from layoffs compared to ICs.

enterprises just love layers and layers of management. can't get enough of it. No CEO has ever seen a management layer he didn't like.

  • True. Also paradoxically, managers are the most likely to have negative value for the company, running entire departments or projects into the ground. Yet you rarely see this being reflected.

  • > management seems to be strangely immune from layoffs compared to ICs.

    This is super common and a very bad sign. As an employee, you are disposable in this type of culture, though it should go without saying.

    > enterprises just love layers and layers of management. can't get enough of it. No CEO has ever seen a management layer he didn't like.

    Bc more warm bodies in your org looks better on the resume. Managing 200 people on paper is more impressive than managing 20.