← Back to context

Comment by hombre_fatal

10 hours ago

You could ask dozens and maybe hundreds of entry level questions about the study that the study answers in its text.

How many of those questions do you feel is adequate to pre-respond to any time you link a study? Especially when assuming incompetence on the person asking the question thus you can't possibly know the questions they are most likely to ask (since they're incompetent)?

And if I'm incompetent, why would anyone trust my summary and pre-responses to the study?

None of this makes sense. And we're getting awfully close of just pasting/linking the study so the person with the questions can just read the dang thing.