← Back to context

Comment by gigel82

20 days ago

I'm curious what you think the alternative is, because Apple is definitely a lot worse, and we all know they're very much a duopoly.

BTW, all the GrapheneOS, etc. are still Android phones.

I'm curious if GrapheneOS or other custom Android builds would be able to avoid these restrictions reasonably.

Obviously this is going to impact the supply of apps, since the market share of custom Android is smaller than even the market share of people willing to sideload or use an alternative store on a mainstream Android phone. Many developers might quit the game.

  • The problem with custom ROMs is that many government, banking, and similar apps don't run on them without workarounds. Some of those apps also consider this as a TOS violation as well.

    • When Microsoft first proposed a remote attestation scheme for PCs under the name Palladium, it was widely seen as a nightmare scenario. Even the mainstream press was critical[0]. There was barely a whimper when Google introduced Safetynet a decade later.

      It wasn't OK in 2003. It wasn't OK in 2014. It isn't OK now. I'm just not sure what anybody can do about it.

      [0] https://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/30/business/technology-a-saf...

      1 reply →

    • There are many third-party money apps that login to your online banking that are a violation of ToS. That doesn't stop people using them. In fact, when they get really big, they can be legitimised by banks. For example, to get my mortgage, I had to use a third party service that logs in to my online banking account and ingests all my transactions to show that I saved for my deposit legitimately.

    • Then I won't run those apps. Seriously. I know not everyone has this option, but it's been my experience that a lot of processes do in fact have workarounds when you show them the cryptic error their poorly behaved app throws.

    • I have been a GrapheneOS user since the Pixel 3 and have yet to encounter an app that doesn't work on GOS.

    • I don’t use any utility apps (identity, banking, services etc) on my phone and stick to the desktop web. And don’t use services that do require me to have a Google or apple account and phone. (Spoiler: I do)

      I hope my tiny datapoint shows up in some aggregated stats somewhere.

      It’s use-it-or-lose-it.

  • GrapheneOS uses a sandboxed version of Google Play Services, not the GMS certified devices they mentioned in the article.

I had a Jolla phone on my hands the other day and I must admit this…

SailfishOS is pretty nice

I might get one next

The alternative is just Apple; if Google loses enough users they might reconsider. Essentially the only real advantage Android had over Apple was being a more free platform/ecosystem; if they're going to do away with that, then they should be shown that this means they'll lose a lot of users.

GrapheneOS is a beautiful stop-gap, but there are real bona-fide Linux smartphones out there. To be clear, there are not many, the hardware often isn't great, the software often isn't great. PinePhone and Librem come to mind.