← Back to context

Comment by Cpoll

8 months ago

Not relevant; a child consenting (or "consenting") to a parental lock on their (or "their") phone isn't the same as Apple locking down their OS. Ditto an employee using a company device.

I consent to Apple controlling my device for security reasons. Again, now what?

  • Great, you can have it. No need to force it on every one else

    • Why is it that your stance isn't the wrong one? Apple sells a device that is locked down. You buy it. You then complain that it was locked down, yet you knew this from the off. They do not sell it as a general purpose compute device. It is sold as a thing that runs apps. We don't complain when Playstations will not play Xbox or Switch games.

      If you want to hack a device and get it do something other than what it was designed for, then that's the hacker spirit so go for it. But why does that mean we* all have to accept your way when we just want to run apps.

      *royal we. i do not use apps as i don't trust any of you app developers to not be shady.

      12 replies →