← Back to context Comment by danans 1 year ago > At which exact point is language prohibited from evolvingNever?https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_change 6 comments danans Reply troad 1 year ago Yes, that was my point. card_zero 1 year ago And here it is, evolving before your eyes: we're killing off the maladaptive mutant which was "opt-in by default". That's the evolution that is happening here. troad 1 year ago That would not be evolution, that would be an attempt at creationism. There is no evolution police, and never will be. 3 replies →
troad 1 year ago Yes, that was my point. card_zero 1 year ago And here it is, evolving before your eyes: we're killing off the maladaptive mutant which was "opt-in by default". That's the evolution that is happening here. troad 1 year ago That would not be evolution, that would be an attempt at creationism. There is no evolution police, and never will be. 3 replies →
card_zero 1 year ago And here it is, evolving before your eyes: we're killing off the maladaptive mutant which was "opt-in by default". That's the evolution that is happening here. troad 1 year ago That would not be evolution, that would be an attempt at creationism. There is no evolution police, and never will be. 3 replies →
troad 1 year ago That would not be evolution, that would be an attempt at creationism. There is no evolution police, and never will be. 3 replies →
Yes, that was my point.
And here it is, evolving before your eyes: we're killing off the maladaptive mutant which was "opt-in by default". That's the evolution that is happening here.
That would not be evolution, that would be an attempt at creationism. There is no evolution police, and never will be.
3 replies →