← Back to context

Comment by soraminazuki

1 year ago

Diluting the distinction between opt-in and opt-out is gaslighting, not "evolution."

That seems like an ungenerous and frankly somewhat hysterical take.

By default, you are opted in. Perfectly clear.

The purpose of language is communication, not validating your politics.

  • > By default, you are opted in. Perfectly clear.

    That's called opt-out. You're doing exactly what I described: gaslighting people into believing that opt-in and opt-out are synonymous, rendering the entire concept meaningless. The audacity of you labeling people as "political" while resorting to such Orwellian manipulation is astounding. How can you lecture others about the purpose of languages with a straight face when you're redefining terms to make it impossible for people to express a concept?

    These are examples of what "opt-in by default" actually means. It means having the user manually consent to something every time, the polar opposite your definition.

    - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37314981

    • I completely agree with you from a correctness standpoint, ...

      > Diluting the distinction between opt-in and opt-out is gaslighting

      > That seems like an ungenerous and frankly somewhat hysterical take.

      ... however, this comment was a reasonable response.

      Projective framing demonstrates your own lack of concern for accuracy, clarity or conviviality, that is 180 degrees at odds with the point you are making and the site you are making it on.

      1 reply →