Comment by bongodongobob
16 days ago
Just because something isn't an HR violation doesn't mean it's not wrong, rude, or unprofessional. Society is not a computer program. Being tactful is important to well adjusted people.
16 days ago
Just because something isn't an HR violation doesn't mean it's not wrong, rude, or unprofessional. Society is not a computer program. Being tactful is important to well adjusted people.
Hard disagree. Being tactful is only relevant when dealing with people, criticise an idea, a project, a solution as much as you like. Intellectual debate is the fire from which genuinely good ideas are forged.
Unfortunately people have ideas, projects, and solutions that they care deeply about. Like it or not, some tact when dealing with these things goes a long way.
I mostly notice that those people aren't emotionally grown up enough to actually produce good results.
When your emotions over your work become more important than the quality of the work you're outputting, you become a problem for people who use your work.
2 replies →
> Unfortunately people have ideas, projects, and solutions that they care deeply about.
This is true of course, but this is also true for the “search for truth” in science. Do we fail to point out the flaw in the reasoning of someone’s life's work for fear of offence? The truth is the higher ideal that must be strived for!
In the same way, an idea is only good once it has been challenged. It may fail and dissolve, it may survive, it may morph into something that can no longer be assailed. This is the forgers fire, and it is necessary.
I know this isn’t as black and white as I’m painting it, but the ideal is still something worth striving for.
1 reply →
Projects to land them a fat salary while delivering no value.
No wonder they used any means necessary (including HR) to defend their source of money.
They probably knew very well they are a net loss for the company.
Lots of big orgs have such crooks. It's a failure of management not to fire them.
It will be easy to dismiss any critisism when it's forced to be vague.