Comment by nullc
8 months ago
Perhaps, but it is not Open Source in the traditional sense if they do not provide the preferred form for modifications.
8 months ago
Perhaps, but it is not Open Source in the traditional sense if they do not provide the preferred form for modifications.
There are also some weird OSS license rules that only trip the disclosure obligation when distributing the build to end users.
Indeed, these adversarial behaviors do not follow the spirit of FOSS community standards. If a project started as FOSS, than FOSS it should remain. =3