Comment by ktosobcy
2 days ago
That's true, but that would be a huge signal of a rejection. What's more - changing such law would be slightly more complex than just introducing the backdor IMHO.
2 days ago
That's true, but that would be a huge signal of a rejection. What's more - changing such law would be slightly more complex than just introducing the backdor IMHO.
> would be slightly more complex than just introducing the backdor
Not really, both things need to be done by a law. So it's the same signal and complexity as just rejecting the law when it's proposed
And the second option at least does away with the pretension of permanence people like to use as an excuse to wash their hands of interest in politics