← Back to context

Comment by yellowapple

16 hours ago

Not even “instead”. We need all of the above: nuclear for base loads, solar for peak loads, batteries for surplus capture.

Base load is a concept of the past, grids around the world are being redesigned to be flexible to reap zero-production-costs renewable energy. Nuclear (which is impossible to run economically as a flexible asset) simply does not fit into that new world anymore.

  • Damn, so we’re left with nothing, because nuclear is by far the most viable moving forward.

This right here. It's not one or the other, its a diverse combination of all of them that makes for the best results.