Comment by unmole

> We're made to feel like we should open source things and not retain exclusive rights to commercialization, because that's not open.

The overwhelming majority of software is not opensource. Somehow the people writing and presumably making a living from them get by just fine.

> And I'm sick of the "but actually his license enabled that" excuses. It's victim blaming.

Publishing code under an opensource licence and then going hysterical about people using that code as allowed by the licence is suggestive of a mental disorder.