← Back to context Comment by thrance 5 months ago Even better to have neither. 3 comments thrance Reply onion2k 5 months ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_is_the_enemy_of_good vintagedave 5 months ago Thus nuclear and solar. Not perfect. Considerably better. dgellow 5 months ago Both nuclear and solar have conditions where they cannot generate energy. Nuclear is also slow to scale up/down. There is a need for something that has the properties of natural gas
onion2k 5 months ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_is_the_enemy_of_good vintagedave 5 months ago Thus nuclear and solar. Not perfect. Considerably better. dgellow 5 months ago Both nuclear and solar have conditions where they cannot generate energy. Nuclear is also slow to scale up/down. There is a need for something that has the properties of natural gas
vintagedave 5 months ago Thus nuclear and solar. Not perfect. Considerably better. dgellow 5 months ago Both nuclear and solar have conditions where they cannot generate energy. Nuclear is also slow to scale up/down. There is a need for something that has the properties of natural gas
dgellow 5 months ago Both nuclear and solar have conditions where they cannot generate energy. Nuclear is also slow to scale up/down. There is a need for something that has the properties of natural gas
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_is_the_enemy_of_good
Thus nuclear and solar. Not perfect. Considerably better.
Both nuclear and solar have conditions where they cannot generate energy. Nuclear is also slow to scale up/down. There is a need for something that has the properties of natural gas