← Back to context Comment by nand2mario 1 day ago Yes, for exactly the reason. SDRAM is much easier to work with in retro computing than DDR. 3 comments nand2mario Reply accrual 1 day ago My first DDR system, an Athlon XP, feels like a very different beast than my 440BX with SDRAM despite being only a couple years newer. :) anthk 1 day ago I had that with a Geforce2. Or was Athlon 2000. Wait, Athlon 2000 at 1666 MHZ, really fast until the capacitors on a Gigayte motherboard blew up. 38 16 hours ago [dead]
accrual 1 day ago My first DDR system, an Athlon XP, feels like a very different beast than my 440BX with SDRAM despite being only a couple years newer. :) anthk 1 day ago I had that with a Geforce2. Or was Athlon 2000. Wait, Athlon 2000 at 1666 MHZ, really fast until the capacitors on a Gigayte motherboard blew up.
anthk 1 day ago I had that with a Geforce2. Or was Athlon 2000. Wait, Athlon 2000 at 1666 MHZ, really fast until the capacitors on a Gigayte motherboard blew up.
My first DDR system, an Athlon XP, feels like a very different beast than my 440BX with SDRAM despite being only a couple years newer. :)
I had that with a Geforce2. Or was Athlon 2000. Wait, Athlon 2000 at 1666 MHZ, really fast until the capacitors on a Gigayte motherboard blew up.
[dead]