← Back to context Comment by kstrauser 8 months ago I'm blown away. I'd have sworn that wasn't possible. It's brilliant. Bravo. 5 comments kstrauser Reply imcritic 8 months ago [flagged] umanwizard 8 months ago Do you think anyone is suggesting this should actually be used for a practical purpose? sniffers 8 months ago Idiotic seems strong. It's an art piece, is it simply not to your taste in art? EGreg 8 months ago Exactly. My taste in art skews idiotic, so what! :) imcritic 8 months ago I am worried someone would use that somewhere thinking it's so artsy. This better not exist at all.
imcritic 8 months ago [flagged] umanwizard 8 months ago Do you think anyone is suggesting this should actually be used for a practical purpose? sniffers 8 months ago Idiotic seems strong. It's an art piece, is it simply not to your taste in art? EGreg 8 months ago Exactly. My taste in art skews idiotic, so what! :) imcritic 8 months ago I am worried someone would use that somewhere thinking it's so artsy. This better not exist at all.
umanwizard 8 months ago Do you think anyone is suggesting this should actually be used for a practical purpose?
sniffers 8 months ago Idiotic seems strong. It's an art piece, is it simply not to your taste in art? EGreg 8 months ago Exactly. My taste in art skews idiotic, so what! :) imcritic 8 months ago I am worried someone would use that somewhere thinking it's so artsy. This better not exist at all.
imcritic 8 months ago I am worried someone would use that somewhere thinking it's so artsy. This better not exist at all.
[flagged]
Do you think anyone is suggesting this should actually be used for a practical purpose?
Idiotic seems strong. It's an art piece, is it simply not to your taste in art?
Exactly. My taste in art skews idiotic, so what! :)
I am worried someone would use that somewhere thinking it's so artsy. This better not exist at all.