← Back to context Comment by kstrauser 1 day ago I'm blown away. I'd have sworn that wasn't possible. It's brilliant. Bravo. 5 comments kstrauser Reply imcritic 1 day ago [flagged] umanwizard 1 day ago Do you think anyone is suggesting this should actually be used for a practical purpose? sniffers 1 day ago Idiotic seems strong. It's an art piece, is it simply not to your taste in art? imcritic 16 hours ago I am worried someone would use that somewhere thinking it's so artsy. This better not exist at all. EGreg 1 day ago Exactly. My taste in art skews idiotic, so what! :)
imcritic 1 day ago [flagged] umanwizard 1 day ago Do you think anyone is suggesting this should actually be used for a practical purpose? sniffers 1 day ago Idiotic seems strong. It's an art piece, is it simply not to your taste in art? imcritic 16 hours ago I am worried someone would use that somewhere thinking it's so artsy. This better not exist at all. EGreg 1 day ago Exactly. My taste in art skews idiotic, so what! :)
umanwizard 1 day ago Do you think anyone is suggesting this should actually be used for a practical purpose?
sniffers 1 day ago Idiotic seems strong. It's an art piece, is it simply not to your taste in art? imcritic 16 hours ago I am worried someone would use that somewhere thinking it's so artsy. This better not exist at all. EGreg 1 day ago Exactly. My taste in art skews idiotic, so what! :)
imcritic 16 hours ago I am worried someone would use that somewhere thinking it's so artsy. This better not exist at all.
[flagged]
Do you think anyone is suggesting this should actually be used for a practical purpose?
Idiotic seems strong. It's an art piece, is it simply not to your taste in art?
I am worried someone would use that somewhere thinking it's so artsy. This better not exist at all.
Exactly. My taste in art skews idiotic, so what! :)