Comment by _DeadFred_
21 hours ago
Yes, being against a society without artists is totally a luddite argument. Being against AI entropy stopping societal progress, stagnating culture at 2025 when humans started stopping contributing to the training set is a luddite argument. Please stop, you are not responding in good faith.
Saying 'I think society should have artists' is not Luddism.
Eh, you say I'm not responding in good faith, and yet that's exactly what I'd accuse you of doing.
For example take this line of mine
>The question is, are we going to hold on to economic systems that don't work under that regime
Currently artistry requires artists get paid somehow in our current system. That means instead of making the art they want, they have to make art that's economically useful to a paying customer. And yet for some reason you don't consider that part of a stagnating culture.