← Back to context Comment by ortusdux 7 months ago Just have an AI summarize it for you /shttps://marketoonist.com/2023/03/ai-written-ai-read.html 2 comments ortusdux Reply elpakal 7 months ago or move the disclaimer to the top. or better yet, have aggregators like HN add a badge if it's likely AI generated jedberg 7 months ago > or better yet, have aggregators like HN add a badge if it's likely AI generatedHow could you possibly tell? I've been playing around with AI detectors, putting in known all-human samples, known all-AI samples, and mixed samples.The only thing it's gotten right is not marking a human sample as 100% AI (but it marked one of the AI samples as 100% human).Having such a mark would be a witch-hunt for sure.
elpakal 7 months ago or move the disclaimer to the top. or better yet, have aggregators like HN add a badge if it's likely AI generated jedberg 7 months ago > or better yet, have aggregators like HN add a badge if it's likely AI generatedHow could you possibly tell? I've been playing around with AI detectors, putting in known all-human samples, known all-AI samples, and mixed samples.The only thing it's gotten right is not marking a human sample as 100% AI (but it marked one of the AI samples as 100% human).Having such a mark would be a witch-hunt for sure.
jedberg 7 months ago > or better yet, have aggregators like HN add a badge if it's likely AI generatedHow could you possibly tell? I've been playing around with AI detectors, putting in known all-human samples, known all-AI samples, and mixed samples.The only thing it's gotten right is not marking a human sample as 100% AI (but it marked one of the AI samples as 100% human).Having such a mark would be a witch-hunt for sure.
or move the disclaimer to the top. or better yet, have aggregators like HN add a badge if it's likely AI generated
> or better yet, have aggregators like HN add a badge if it's likely AI generated
How could you possibly tell? I've been playing around with AI detectors, putting in known all-human samples, known all-AI samples, and mixed samples.
The only thing it's gotten right is not marking a human sample as 100% AI (but it marked one of the AI samples as 100% human).
Having such a mark would be a witch-hunt for sure.