Comment by awesome_dude

> I don’t see how disagreeing with you constitutes “a complete and utter lack of grasp of the subject”. That’s hyperbole.

Your complaint is that I am applying your measure with the same effort that you did to me.

The current upper bounds are constantly being reviewed, just as with other active areas of research. With that in mind, we don't really know what the final upper bound might be, we can only say with any semblance of surety that the upper bound at any given point in time is limited by our imagination (read: our ability to create new and possible novel ways to model the future)