← Back to context

Comment by laserlight

9 days ago

> Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity.

Any sufficiently advanced malice is indistinguishable from stupidity.

I don't think there's anything that can't be attributed to stupidity, so the statement is pointless. Besides, it doesn't really matter naming an action stupidity, when the consequences are indistinguishable from that of malice.

I know of one datacenter that burned down because someone took a dump before leaving for the day, the toilet overflowed, then flooded the basement, and eventually started an electrical fire.

I'm not sure you could realistically explain that as anything. Sometimes ... shit happens.

I mean, I don't disagree that "gross negligence" is a thing. But that's still very different from outright malice. Intent matters. The legal system also makes such a distinction. Punishments differ. If you're a prosecutor, you can't just make the argument that "this negligence is indistinguishable from malice, therefore punish like malice was involved".