Comment by eviks
3 months ago
No, he isn't, you're just confused about the comment chain. I was replying to a different person about a different issue.
3 months ago
No, he isn't, you're just confused about the comment chain. I was replying to a different person about a different issue.
I think you likely missed #1 in the chain:
1. logifail: I've been using Win10 LTSC since it first shipped, but the pain of it keeps increasing
2. MarcelOlsz: We're so screwed...Win 10 days are numbered
3. You: Win 10 days are numbered in years
4. Me: Erm + quote from #1
5. You: how is this relevant to number of years
6. Me: He's saying there are problems now
7. You (parent of this): I was replying to someone else
8. Me: this
If we ignore relevance, you missed a comment above 1. If we don't, you missed an explanation how 1. is relevant when I wasn't discussing logifail's pain with Win10, but marcel's lamentation that the better version will soon be gone before a replacement is viable
Marcel laments that Windows 10's days are numbered
As I understand it, you seem to respond that actually Windows 10 has a long life ahead (its "days are numbered in years"). Yet just above that--the comment causing Marcel's lamentations--is evidence that Windows 10 is already on its way out now.
How would that evidence--that Windows 10 is already a problem--not be relevant to your assertion that Windows 10's days will be numbered in years?
How will its days be numbered in years if there are problems with ecosystem support for it today?
For the record, I detest Windows 11 and intend to stay on Windows 10 until I'm forced off of it
2 replies →