Comment by tyleo
5 months ago
It doesn’t cover every protected class. You can look them up.
> This "ackchyually" behavior from HN is so bizarre.
Folks generally want to discuss the facts here, not hyperbole. The headline is hyperbolic. The fact is that Apple isn’t saying ICE is a “protected class”. The content of the article doesn’t even back this point up.
> Folks generally want to discuss the facts here, not hyperbole
Are you new here? No they dont. Dolks here generally discuss like folks anywhere else, riffing off headlines and going by feels. We are overall more educated then average, more wealthy then average and biased tech way. That is it.
I’m sorry if that’s been your experience. It hasn’t been mine. Conversation here feels notably more fact-based than X or Facebook.
The fact is that neither the headline nor the article claims that the definition of "protected class" being used is the same exact legal definition used in the US.
The fact is that Apple is saying ICE is a "targeted group" and lays out every single legally protected class along with it. You can look them up if you are unaware.
The fact is that the article backs this point by citing the exact TOS.
You don't care about facts.
> You don't care about facts.
And you evidently don’t care about having a discussion. You’d rather criticize.