← Back to context

Comment by UltraSane

5 days ago

The Cracker Barrel "controversy" seems to have largely been fueled by bots.

Any source for that?

  • https://www.nrn.com/casual-dining/cracker-barrel-s-logo-cont...

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/bot-networks-are-helping-drag-c...

    • The vast majority of Twitter posts are by bots, so 44.5% seems like a higher proportion of humans than usual. The Cracker Barrel thing was a hot topic amongst people I know for a good 48 hours.

      It's more interesting to me how, without fail, a comment always pops in at the mention of Cracker Barrel to say "those were bots, fellow human."

      1 reply →

    • Did anyone short Cracker Barrel stock? If not, I have a hard time seeing why bots would have any interest in investing the time/money. There also didn't seem to be any political clout being gained by the complaints.

      More real-world is that I know tons of friends/relatives in the South and I don't know of even ONE that liked the redesign.

      28 replies →

    • > According to research obtained by the Wall Street Journal from PeakMetrics, 44.5% of X posts about Cracker Barrel on Aug. 20 (when the new logo began to go viral), were posted by “bots or likely bots,” rising to 49% at the peak of the controversy.

      I wonder how much this differs from the percentage for any trending topic on X?