← Back to context Comment by dang 4 days ago [stub for offtopicness](we changed 'open source' to 'source available' in the title above) 3 comments dang Reply dekhn 4 days ago I flagged this because it appears the system is not actually open-source using the common understanding of the term. amacbride 4 days ago “At this point, private individuals will not be able to obtain licences to the NanoMi platform.”Does “open source” have a different meaning in Canadian? observationist 4 days ago It looks to me like they're doing some sort of legal technicality in order to qualify for funding of some sort.This appears to be F tier legal fuckery, not open source at all.
dekhn 4 days ago I flagged this because it appears the system is not actually open-source using the common understanding of the term.
amacbride 4 days ago “At this point, private individuals will not be able to obtain licences to the NanoMi platform.”Does “open source” have a different meaning in Canadian? observationist 4 days ago It looks to me like they're doing some sort of legal technicality in order to qualify for funding of some sort.This appears to be F tier legal fuckery, not open source at all.
observationist 4 days ago It looks to me like they're doing some sort of legal technicality in order to qualify for funding of some sort.This appears to be F tier legal fuckery, not open source at all.
I flagged this because it appears the system is not actually open-source using the common understanding of the term.
“At this point, private individuals will not be able to obtain licences to the NanoMi platform.”
Does “open source” have a different meaning in Canadian?
It looks to me like they're doing some sort of legal technicality in order to qualify for funding of some sort.
This appears to be F tier legal fuckery, not open source at all.