Comment by andreynering
3 days ago
For those that don't know, on Settings > Appeaarance there is a setting for "Use a fixed-width (monospace) font when editing Markdown". It's already a good QoL improvements (and it should be the default, honestly).
3 days ago
For those that don't know, on Settings > Appeaarance there is a setting for "Use a fixed-width (monospace) font when editing Markdown". It's already a good QoL improvements (and it should be the default, honestly).
At the beginning of Gitcasso, I took a little survey of GitLab, Reddit, ChatGPT, Claude, etc. to see how they were doing their textboxes. Of those I just listed, GitHub is the only one still using a plain textarea, all of the rest have a wysiwyg richtext gizmo (with GitLab and Reddit you can opt-in to markdown).
But by using the same variable-width font that the rendered comment uses, GitHub's default gives you more of a wysiwyg experience than a monospace font does. With syntax-highlighting it's an even more wysiwyg feel, but with absolutely none of the content ambiguity that richtext normally brings with it.
I came away really impressed with GitHub. For any given decision, it's hard to tell if the market victor won because of their good taste or if they won in spite of that particular decision and there was somewhere else where the good decisions were decisive. But as the GitHub issue/PR commenting system stands today, I have a hard time finding much to gripe with (except the missing syntax highlighting, of course).