← Back to context Comment by rurban 4 days ago It's only Microsoft's fault to have not implemented it for decades in MSVC. They stayed at C89 forever. 2 comments rurban Reply flykespice 3 days ago I never understand the reason why Microsoft lagged so much behind on newer c standards adoption. Did their compiler infrastructure made it difficult to adopt newer standards flexible? Or they simply did not care? rurban 3 days ago They focused on C++ only. Management, not their devs.
flykespice 3 days ago I never understand the reason why Microsoft lagged so much behind on newer c standards adoption. Did their compiler infrastructure made it difficult to adopt newer standards flexible? Or they simply did not care? rurban 3 days ago They focused on C++ only. Management, not their devs.
I never understand the reason why Microsoft lagged so much behind on newer c standards adoption. Did their compiler infrastructure made it difficult to adopt newer standards flexible? Or they simply did not care?
They focused on C++ only. Management, not their devs.