← Back to context

Comment by swyx

16 hours ago

(i'm the author) it was 100% human, i'm afraid to say. i was trying to summarize a lot of content in a concise article.

An erroneous summarization is:

  The Tiny Teams concept has resonated so strongly that it’s 
  pretty clear it is the next major transition of the org 
  chart as we go from level 2 to 3 AGI.

LLM's, nor any offerings based upon them, qualify as Artificial General Intelligence[0]. So to assert there is an existing "level 2" AGI, let alone a progression to "level 3" AGI, is nonsensical.

0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_general_intelligenc...

  • Quoting wikipedia:

    >Researchers generally hold that a system is required to do all of the following to be regarded as an AGI:[34]

    > - reason, use strategy, solve puzzles, and make judgments under uncertainty > - represent knowledge, including common sense knowledge > - plan > - learn > - communicate in natural language > - if necessary, integrate these skills in completion of any given goal

    Modern AI can do all of those.

  • [flagged]