Comment by OG_BME
7 hours ago
The writing style of this article is interested, on one hand, it's packed full of details and information like a well-researched, human-written article.
On the other, there are many ChatGPTisms, it's not this, it's that, groups of 3 terms, em-dashes, etc.
My thinking is that there was a thorough draft written by a human that then was passed through an LLM and heavily modified. Not that there's a problem with that.
Yeah and right at the top: "Key Points and Summary – " followed by the ChatGPT writing tell of "It's a <statement>: x, y, and z."
That’s just good typography and editing.
My exact reaction. I noticed the repetitiveness. Count how many times they reiterate the point that this was a shock for the US Navy.