← Back to context

Comment by philosopher1234

4 months ago

I’m not hearing an argument, and I won’t be thinking one up for you. Seems like only a difference of degree to me.

12 comments

philosopher1234

Reply
maximus_01  4 months ago

I'm not here to debate whether free markets are good or bad, but governments have a privileged position versus private companies, and effectively operate above the law (again at least compared to private companies). Any government intervention takes us away from a free market, either a little bit or a lot, depending on the action. Apple is a private company. Anything it does is really part of the free market, at least in the original meaning of that as described by Adam Smith and co.

  • nicoburns  4 months ago

    > governments have a privileged position versus private companies, and effectively operate above the law

    A lot of private companies effectively operate above the law too! In theory the law can be enforced on them. In practice it often isn't.

  • philosopher1234  4 months ago

    We’re talking about China subsidizing goods that it sells in another country. This is bread and butter “free market” behavior. Literally every company in the world does this one way or another.

next_xibalba  4 months ago

OK, let me help a bit more.

A government has a monopoly on violence. A government has a monopoly on money printing and taxation. A government has a monopoly on the legislation. A government has far more human and financial resources than any other economic actor within its borders.

If a company goes out of business, people lose their jobs. If a government goes out of business, people lose their lives.

It is not a difference in degree, it is a difference in kind. There is a reason that economist distinguish between private firms and government.