Comment by chris_wot
12 hours ago
I’m so confused why people are ragging on this. Why is this considered detrimental? Looks pretty good to me…
12 hours ago
I’m so confused why people are ragging on this. Why is this considered detrimental? Looks pretty good to me…
People who don’t understand the problems CSS has to solve are opposed to CSS solving those problems. Sure it can all be stuffed into Tailwind classes!!
¯\\_(ツ)_/¯
I'm no expert in this domain, but I suspect it's less "this is a bad problem to solve" and more "every solution to a problem moves farther away from the ideal simplicity of a markup langage."
(I'm not weighing in on the validity of this position, just reporting what I perceive the position itself to be.)
It's a post about web development on HN. Half the comments will rag incessantly, half will talk about how the web should go back to being a delivery mechanism for documents only like it's 1995 forever, someone will rant about Google for some reason. It's a neverending nightmare.
Don't forget the people that have to tell us how much they hate JavaScript on every single web dev post too