Comment by OkayPhysicist
1 day ago
The felony murder rule completely sidesteps this. For felony murder, all the prosecution needs to establish is 1) you committed a listed felony (arson is included) and 2) someone died because of your actions.
The textbook example is running someone over while fleeing the scene of a robbery. You didn't have mens rea for murder, the crime you intended to commit was robbery. But you chose to commit a felony, and someone did die because of it. Not only that, it's potentially capital murder, because it was for financial gain (Newsom put a moratorium on felony murder death sentences, so that's not a thing at the moment).
Many crimes violate the law in multiple ways. Arson can be charged as both a felony murder and a second degree murder.
It is easier to prove the felony murder. Was it on the list of felonies? To prove the second degree murder, you have to demonstrate "extreme recklessness". Prosecutors will often pile up multiple charges like this. To give the jury as many options as possible to convict.
I'm not a lawyer. But in this case the fact that he called emergency services could be evidence against extreme recklessness, and therefore second degree murder. But felony murder still fits.