← Back to context

Comment by verisimi

8 hours ago

If it can target and kill cancer, how can it also be safe for foetuses?

That's like asking how if a laser can cut through steel how lamps can be safe to have indoors.

  • Do you have a link or something that compares the power in both? I can't find one.

    This is the summary I get from chatgpt - comparing Histotripsy and ultrasound imaging

    | Property | Strongest Diagnostic / Imaging Ultrasound | Histotripsy (Therapeutic Ultrasound |

    | Frequency | 2 – 10 MHz (obstetric: 2–5 MHz; high-res imaging up to 15 MHz) | 0.25 – 3 MHz (sometimes up to 6 MHz) |

    | Pressure (Peak Negative) | Up to ~5–6 MPa (mechanical index limit ≈ 1.9) | 10 – 100 MPa (depending on type: intrinsic vs. boiling histotripsy) |

    | Intensity (Spatial Peak, Temporal Average) | Typically < 0.1 W/cm²; upper safe limit ≈ 0.72 W/cm² (FDA/AIUM) | 100 – 10,000 W/cm² (very high peak intensities) |

    | Pulse Duration | Microseconds (∼1–5 µs typical) | Microseconds to milliseconds (short bursts for mechanical disruption) |

    Its kind of hard to know what this means - some of the numbers seem pretty close/crossover - but I don't think saying the difference is akin to a laser and a light.

Shit, you figured it out. It's not! That's whats been causing all the autism! Big ultrasound has been managing to keep this under wraps for decades!

  • Please don't be sarcastic for a possibility genuine question. It contributes to alienating the askers, not to mention the risk of some taking it quite literally.