← Back to context Comment by ptsneves 3 months ago > Besides, people are using LLMs for exactly that for agesHey! How old are you!? 2 comments ptsneves Reply Sharlin 3 months ago 5+ years is definitely "ages" in LLM context. It was a thing way before GPT 3.5 (obviously, as this is humans we're talking about). brianbest101 3 months ago [dead]
Sharlin 3 months ago 5+ years is definitely "ages" in LLM context. It was a thing way before GPT 3.5 (obviously, as this is humans we're talking about).
5+ years is definitely "ages" in LLM context. It was a thing way before GPT 3.5 (obviously, as this is humans we're talking about).
[dead]