Comment by cxr
4 months ago
You are not representing the facts of the Diebold case accurately or the court's findings.
None of the defenses you're citing here would hold water in court.
(We're not in court here, and there's nothing more to say, so this will be my last response about this.)
Unsubstantiated claims like "none of these defenses would hold" just spread FUD. I don't see a reason why anyone would discourage HN users from accessing QNX sources under QSS's free educational access. The 2007 press release explicitly allows non-commercial downloads and studying; fair use supports personal research too.