← Back to context Comment by Dylan16807 1 year ago Discouraging unreliable free things is good in a lot of cases. 5 comments Dylan16807 Reply arghwhat 1 year ago You just get fewer free things then. Not sure how thats good. Dylan16807 1 year ago Free things tend to push out competition. So the worst case scenario is pushing out competition and then disappearing. arghwhat 1 year ago This happens more often with paid things, as these have a direct financial incentive to elliminate competition and grow adoption. Free stuff does not. 2 replies →
arghwhat 1 year ago You just get fewer free things then. Not sure how thats good. Dylan16807 1 year ago Free things tend to push out competition. So the worst case scenario is pushing out competition and then disappearing. arghwhat 1 year ago This happens more often with paid things, as these have a direct financial incentive to elliminate competition and grow adoption. Free stuff does not. 2 replies →
Dylan16807 1 year ago Free things tend to push out competition. So the worst case scenario is pushing out competition and then disappearing. arghwhat 1 year ago This happens more often with paid things, as these have a direct financial incentive to elliminate competition and grow adoption. Free stuff does not. 2 replies →
arghwhat 1 year ago This happens more often with paid things, as these have a direct financial incentive to elliminate competition and grow adoption. Free stuff does not. 2 replies →
You just get fewer free things then. Not sure how thats good.
Free things tend to push out competition. So the worst case scenario is pushing out competition and then disappearing.
This happens more often with paid things, as these have a direct financial incentive to elliminate competition and grow adoption. Free stuff does not.
2 replies →