← Back to context Comment by Yossarrian22 4 months ago I don’t think speech can be compelled like that latter idea 3 comments Yossarrian22 Reply rdtsc 4 months ago Are payments "speech" though? Just like the Israeli govt thinks they are being "cute" with the "winks" so can other governments be "cute" with their interpretation of "speech". kevin_thibedeau 4 months ago The Supreme court has labeled political spending as free speech. No reason it can't extend everywhere. DonHopkins 4 months ago Money talks.
rdtsc 4 months ago Are payments "speech" though? Just like the Israeli govt thinks they are being "cute" with the "winks" so can other governments be "cute" with their interpretation of "speech". kevin_thibedeau 4 months ago The Supreme court has labeled political spending as free speech. No reason it can't extend everywhere. DonHopkins 4 months ago Money talks.
kevin_thibedeau 4 months ago The Supreme court has labeled political spending as free speech. No reason it can't extend everywhere.
Are payments "speech" though? Just like the Israeli govt thinks they are being "cute" with the "winks" so can other governments be "cute" with their interpretation of "speech".
The Supreme court has labeled political spending as free speech. No reason it can't extend everywhere.
Money talks.