← Back to context Comment by dsamarin 3 months ago Do you consider the color yellow on your RGB monitor an illusion? (I do) 4 comments dsamarin Reply zamadatix 3 months ago Same. A fun fact about this is as you increase the bit depth, the percentage of faked outputs actually increases as well. With just 8 bits, you have more 9's than AWS this year! TuxSH 3 months ago You can also add a temporal dimension (-> temporal dithering, also known as FRC).For example if you alternate blue and red every frame at 60~120 FPS, the only thing you'll see is purple. egypturnash 3 months ago With red/blue artifacts visible when the viewer’s gaze passes rapidly across it. hatthew 3 months ago I personally wouldn't, but it's close enough that I'm not going to disagree.
zamadatix 3 months ago Same. A fun fact about this is as you increase the bit depth, the percentage of faked outputs actually increases as well. With just 8 bits, you have more 9's than AWS this year! TuxSH 3 months ago You can also add a temporal dimension (-> temporal dithering, also known as FRC).For example if you alternate blue and red every frame at 60~120 FPS, the only thing you'll see is purple. egypturnash 3 months ago With red/blue artifacts visible when the viewer’s gaze passes rapidly across it.
TuxSH 3 months ago You can also add a temporal dimension (-> temporal dithering, also known as FRC).For example if you alternate blue and red every frame at 60~120 FPS, the only thing you'll see is purple. egypturnash 3 months ago With red/blue artifacts visible when the viewer’s gaze passes rapidly across it.
egypturnash 3 months ago With red/blue artifacts visible when the viewer’s gaze passes rapidly across it.
Same. A fun fact about this is as you increase the bit depth, the percentage of faked outputs actually increases as well. With just 8 bits, you have more 9's than AWS this year!
You can also add a temporal dimension (-> temporal dithering, also known as FRC).
For example if you alternate blue and red every frame at 60~120 FPS, the only thing you'll see is purple.
With red/blue artifacts visible when the viewer’s gaze passes rapidly across it.
I personally wouldn't, but it's close enough that I'm not going to disagree.