← Back to context Comment by procaryote 6 days ago How is apt performance sensitive? 8 comments procaryote Reply kragen 6 days ago Apt has been painfully slow since I started using Debian last millennium, but I suspect it's not because it uses a lot of CPU, or it would be snappy by now. dontlaugh 6 days ago It parses formats and does TLS, I’m assuming it’d be quite bad. I don’t think you can mix and match. jitl 6 days ago stuff that talks to "the internet" and runs as "root" seems like a good thing to build with filc. loeg 6 days ago It probably uses OS sandboxing primitives already. 3 replies →
kragen 6 days ago Apt has been painfully slow since I started using Debian last millennium, but I suspect it's not because it uses a lot of CPU, or it would be snappy by now.
dontlaugh 6 days ago It parses formats and does TLS, I’m assuming it’d be quite bad. I don’t think you can mix and match. jitl 6 days ago stuff that talks to "the internet" and runs as "root" seems like a good thing to build with filc. loeg 6 days ago It probably uses OS sandboxing primitives already. 3 replies →
jitl 6 days ago stuff that talks to "the internet" and runs as "root" seems like a good thing to build with filc. loeg 6 days ago It probably uses OS sandboxing primitives already. 3 replies →
Apt has been painfully slow since I started using Debian last millennium, but I suspect it's not because it uses a lot of CPU, or it would be snappy by now.
It parses formats and does TLS, I’m assuming it’d be quite bad. I don’t think you can mix and match.
stuff that talks to "the internet" and runs as "root" seems like a good thing to build with filc.
It probably uses OS sandboxing primitives already.
3 replies →