← Back to context Comment by ajuc 6 days ago yeah, the tax should be based on car weight per passanger 4 comments ajuc Reply gambiting 6 days ago That will just make the gigantic SUVs with 7 or more seats dominate even more. ajuc 6 days ago car weight / min(number of seats, number of people in the family) gameman144 6 days ago This metric disincentivizes carpooling -- everyone should drive a light single-seater to minimize their tax.(I agree with the spirit, just calling out that there are going to be edge cases galore with a scenario like this) 1 reply →
gambiting 6 days ago That will just make the gigantic SUVs with 7 or more seats dominate even more. ajuc 6 days ago car weight / min(number of seats, number of people in the family) gameman144 6 days ago This metric disincentivizes carpooling -- everyone should drive a light single-seater to minimize their tax.(I agree with the spirit, just calling out that there are going to be edge cases galore with a scenario like this) 1 reply →
ajuc 6 days ago car weight / min(number of seats, number of people in the family) gameman144 6 days ago This metric disincentivizes carpooling -- everyone should drive a light single-seater to minimize their tax.(I agree with the spirit, just calling out that there are going to be edge cases galore with a scenario like this) 1 reply →
gameman144 6 days ago This metric disincentivizes carpooling -- everyone should drive a light single-seater to minimize their tax.(I agree with the spirit, just calling out that there are going to be edge cases galore with a scenario like this) 1 reply →
That will just make the gigantic SUVs with 7 or more seats dominate even more.
car weight / min(number of seats, number of people in the family)
This metric disincentivizes carpooling -- everyone should drive a light single-seater to minimize their tax.
(I agree with the spirit, just calling out that there are going to be edge cases galore with a scenario like this)
1 reply →